convex optimization toolbox using proximal splitting methods Search Results


99
Akoya Biosciences proximal
Proximal, supplied by Akoya Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/proximal/product/Akoya Biosciences
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proximal - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc package bayesian optimized pla signal sorting (bopss)
Three counting images of the single (A) , dual (B) and negative <t>PLA</t> (C) from subject PI12277 were used to test puncta detection and quantification approaches with selected parameters: Particle Analysis (Image J) with auto threshold (Image J_Auto, D-F), Spot Detector (ICY) with parameters favoring detection of either dual and negative (ICY_D, G–I) or single (ICY_S, J–L) PLA signals, and <t>BOPSS</t> (BOPSS, M–O). Image J and ICY quantified the puncta in the transformed and contrast enhanced images (D–L) as described in Supplementary data. The counted puncta were marked in red dots (D-F & M-O) or labeled in red numbers (G-L) in the analyzed images. Single PLA puncta density results were analyzed with repeated one-way ANOVA; there was a significant effect of quantification method (p = 0.014) (P). Dual PLA and its negative control were analyzed by repeated two-way ANOVA, as they shared the same PLA conditions except for the omission of one of the two primary antibodies; the interaction between quantification method and PLA signal was not significant (accounts for 3.73% for the total variance, p = 0.21); both the quantification method (accounts for 56.9% of the total variance, p = 0.005) and the PLA condition (accounts for 26.22% of the total variance, p = 0.009) had significant effects on the variance (Q). Bonferroni's multiple comparisons were performed for both sets of analyses: to compare BOPSS and the other quantification methods: *Multiplicity-adjusted p < 0.05 (P & Q) ; to compare the results of dual PLA and negative PLA results: # Multiplicity-adjusted p < 0.05 (Q). Data were plotted as mean ± SEM. PLA: Proximity ligation assay.
Package Bayesian Optimized Pla Signal Sorting (Bopss), supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/package bayesian optimized pla signal sorting (bopss)/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
package bayesian optimized pla signal sorting (bopss) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
St Jude Medical proximal protection proxis
Three counting images of the single (A) , dual (B) and negative <t>PLA</t> (C) from subject PI12277 were used to test puncta detection and quantification approaches with selected parameters: Particle Analysis (Image J) with auto threshold (Image J_Auto, D-F), Spot Detector (ICY) with parameters favoring detection of either dual and negative (ICY_D, G–I) or single (ICY_S, J–L) PLA signals, and <t>BOPSS</t> (BOPSS, M–O). Image J and ICY quantified the puncta in the transformed and contrast enhanced images (D–L) as described in Supplementary data. The counted puncta were marked in red dots (D-F & M-O) or labeled in red numbers (G-L) in the analyzed images. Single PLA puncta density results were analyzed with repeated one-way ANOVA; there was a significant effect of quantification method (p = 0.014) (P). Dual PLA and its negative control were analyzed by repeated two-way ANOVA, as they shared the same PLA conditions except for the omission of one of the two primary antibodies; the interaction between quantification method and PLA signal was not significant (accounts for 3.73% for the total variance, p = 0.21); both the quantification method (accounts for 56.9% of the total variance, p = 0.005) and the PLA condition (accounts for 26.22% of the total variance, p = 0.009) had significant effects on the variance (Q). Bonferroni's multiple comparisons were performed for both sets of analyses: to compare BOPSS and the other quantification methods: *Multiplicity-adjusted p < 0.05 (P & Q) ; to compare the results of dual PLA and negative PLA results: # Multiplicity-adjusted p < 0.05 (Q). Data were plotted as mean ± SEM. PLA: Proximity ligation assay.
Proximal Protection Proxis, supplied by St Jude Medical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/proximal protection proxis/product/St Jude Medical
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proximal protection proxis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
St Jude Medical proxis embolic protection system proximal
Three counting images of the single (A) , dual (B) and negative <t>PLA</t> (C) from subject PI12277 were used to test puncta detection and quantification approaches with selected parameters: Particle Analysis (Image J) with auto threshold (Image J_Auto, D-F), Spot Detector (ICY) with parameters favoring detection of either dual and negative (ICY_D, G–I) or single (ICY_S, J–L) PLA signals, and <t>BOPSS</t> (BOPSS, M–O). Image J and ICY quantified the puncta in the transformed and contrast enhanced images (D–L) as described in Supplementary data. The counted puncta were marked in red dots (D-F & M-O) or labeled in red numbers (G-L) in the analyzed images. Single PLA puncta density results were analyzed with repeated one-way ANOVA; there was a significant effect of quantification method (p = 0.014) (P). Dual PLA and its negative control were analyzed by repeated two-way ANOVA, as they shared the same PLA conditions except for the omission of one of the two primary antibodies; the interaction between quantification method and PLA signal was not significant (accounts for 3.73% for the total variance, p = 0.21); both the quantification method (accounts for 56.9% of the total variance, p = 0.005) and the PLA condition (accounts for 26.22% of the total variance, p = 0.009) had significant effects on the variance (Q). Bonferroni's multiple comparisons were performed for both sets of analyses: to compare BOPSS and the other quantification methods: *Multiplicity-adjusted p < 0.05 (P & Q) ; to compare the results of dual PLA and negative PLA results: # Multiplicity-adjusted p < 0.05 (Q). Data were plotted as mean ± SEM. PLA: Proximity ligation assay.
Proxis Embolic Protection System Proximal, supplied by St Jude Medical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/proxis embolic protection system proximal/product/St Jude Medical
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proxis embolic protection system proximal - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
St Jude Medical proxis (st. jude medical)
Three counting images of the single (A) , dual (B) and negative <t>PLA</t> (C) from subject PI12277 were used to test puncta detection and quantification approaches with selected parameters: Particle Analysis (Image J) with auto threshold (Image J_Auto, D-F), Spot Detector (ICY) with parameters favoring detection of either dual and negative (ICY_D, G–I) or single (ICY_S, J–L) PLA signals, and <t>BOPSS</t> (BOPSS, M–O). Image J and ICY quantified the puncta in the transformed and contrast enhanced images (D–L) as described in Supplementary data. The counted puncta were marked in red dots (D-F & M-O) or labeled in red numbers (G-L) in the analyzed images. Single PLA puncta density results were analyzed with repeated one-way ANOVA; there was a significant effect of quantification method (p = 0.014) (P). Dual PLA and its negative control were analyzed by repeated two-way ANOVA, as they shared the same PLA conditions except for the omission of one of the two primary antibodies; the interaction between quantification method and PLA signal was not significant (accounts for 3.73% for the total variance, p = 0.21); both the quantification method (accounts for 56.9% of the total variance, p = 0.005) and the PLA condition (accounts for 26.22% of the total variance, p = 0.009) had significant effects on the variance (Q). Bonferroni's multiple comparisons were performed for both sets of analyses: to compare BOPSS and the other quantification methods: *Multiplicity-adjusted p < 0.05 (P & Q) ; to compare the results of dual PLA and negative PLA results: # Multiplicity-adjusted p < 0.05 (Q). Data were plotted as mean ± SEM. PLA: Proximity ligation assay.
Proxis (St. Jude Medical), supplied by St Jude Medical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/proxis (st. jude medical)/product/St Jude Medical
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proxis (st. jude medical) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
St Jude Medical proximal protection device proxis
Three counting images of the single (A) , dual (B) and negative <t>PLA</t> (C) from subject PI12277 were used to test puncta detection and quantification approaches with selected parameters: Particle Analysis (Image J) with auto threshold (Image J_Auto, D-F), Spot Detector (ICY) with parameters favoring detection of either dual and negative (ICY_D, G–I) or single (ICY_S, J–L) PLA signals, and <t>BOPSS</t> (BOPSS, M–O). Image J and ICY quantified the puncta in the transformed and contrast enhanced images (D–L) as described in Supplementary data. The counted puncta were marked in red dots (D-F & M-O) or labeled in red numbers (G-L) in the analyzed images. Single PLA puncta density results were analyzed with repeated one-way ANOVA; there was a significant effect of quantification method (p = 0.014) (P). Dual PLA and its negative control were analyzed by repeated two-way ANOVA, as they shared the same PLA conditions except for the omission of one of the two primary antibodies; the interaction between quantification method and PLA signal was not significant (accounts for 3.73% for the total variance, p = 0.21); both the quantification method (accounts for 56.9% of the total variance, p = 0.005) and the PLA condition (accounts for 26.22% of the total variance, p = 0.009) had significant effects on the variance (Q). Bonferroni's multiple comparisons were performed for both sets of analyses: to compare BOPSS and the other quantification methods: *Multiplicity-adjusted p < 0.05 (P & Q) ; to compare the results of dual PLA and negative PLA results: # Multiplicity-adjusted p < 0.05 (Q). Data were plotted as mean ± SEM. PLA: Proximity ligation assay.
Proximal Protection Device Proxis, supplied by St Jude Medical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/proximal protection device proxis/product/St Jude Medical
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proximal protection device proxis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
St Jude Medical proximal occlusion device proxis
Three counting images of the single (A) , dual (B) and negative <t>PLA</t> (C) from subject PI12277 were used to test puncta detection and quantification approaches with selected parameters: Particle Analysis (Image J) with auto threshold (Image J_Auto, D-F), Spot Detector (ICY) with parameters favoring detection of either dual and negative (ICY_D, G–I) or single (ICY_S, J–L) PLA signals, and <t>BOPSS</t> (BOPSS, M–O). Image J and ICY quantified the puncta in the transformed and contrast enhanced images (D–L) as described in Supplementary data. The counted puncta were marked in red dots (D-F & M-O) or labeled in red numbers (G-L) in the analyzed images. Single PLA puncta density results were analyzed with repeated one-way ANOVA; there was a significant effect of quantification method (p = 0.014) (P). Dual PLA and its negative control were analyzed by repeated two-way ANOVA, as they shared the same PLA conditions except for the omission of one of the two primary antibodies; the interaction between quantification method and PLA signal was not significant (accounts for 3.73% for the total variance, p = 0.21); both the quantification method (accounts for 56.9% of the total variance, p = 0.005) and the PLA condition (accounts for 26.22% of the total variance, p = 0.009) had significant effects on the variance (Q). Bonferroni's multiple comparisons were performed for both sets of analyses: to compare BOPSS and the other quantification methods: *Multiplicity-adjusted p < 0.05 (P & Q) ; to compare the results of dual PLA and negative PLA results: # Multiplicity-adjusted p < 0.05 (Q). Data were plotted as mean ± SEM. PLA: Proximity ligation assay.
Proximal Occlusion Device Proxis, supplied by St Jude Medical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/proximal occlusion device proxis/product/St Jude Medical
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proximal occlusion device proxis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Phase Genomics proximo hi-c (plant) kit (version 4)
Hi-C <t> chromosome </t> conformation capture linkage statistics
Proximo Hi C (Plant) Kit (Version 4), supplied by Phase Genomics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/proximo hi-c (plant) kit (version 4)/product/Phase Genomics
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proximo hi-c (plant) kit (version 4) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Phase Genomics proximo hi-c plant kit
Hi-C <t> chromosome </t> conformation capture linkage statistics
Proximo Hi C Plant Kit, supplied by Phase Genomics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/proximo hi-c plant kit/product/Phase Genomics
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proximo hi-c plant kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Phase Genomics proximo hi-c v4.5 kit
Hi-C <t> chromosome </t> conformation capture linkage statistics
Proximo Hi C V4.5 Kit, supplied by Phase Genomics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/proximo hi-c v4.5 kit/product/Phase Genomics
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proximo hi-c v4.5 kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SymBio Inc proximate analysis
Hi-C <t> chromosome </t> conformation capture linkage statistics
Proximate Analysis, supplied by SymBio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/proximate analysis/product/SymBio Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proximate analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
NORELL metatarsal i
Hi-C <t> chromosome </t> conformation capture linkage statistics
Metatarsal I, supplied by NORELL, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/metatarsal i/product/NORELL
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
metatarsal i - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Three counting images of the single (A) , dual (B) and negative PLA (C) from subject PI12277 were used to test puncta detection and quantification approaches with selected parameters: Particle Analysis (Image J) with auto threshold (Image J_Auto, D-F), Spot Detector (ICY) with parameters favoring detection of either dual and negative (ICY_D, G–I) or single (ICY_S, J–L) PLA signals, and BOPSS (BOPSS, M–O). Image J and ICY quantified the puncta in the transformed and contrast enhanced images (D–L) as described in Supplementary data. The counted puncta were marked in red dots (D-F & M-O) or labeled in red numbers (G-L) in the analyzed images. Single PLA puncta density results were analyzed with repeated one-way ANOVA; there was a significant effect of quantification method (p = 0.014) (P). Dual PLA and its negative control were analyzed by repeated two-way ANOVA, as they shared the same PLA conditions except for the omission of one of the two primary antibodies; the interaction between quantification method and PLA signal was not significant (accounts for 3.73% for the total variance, p = 0.21); both the quantification method (accounts for 56.9% of the total variance, p = 0.005) and the PLA condition (accounts for 26.22% of the total variance, p = 0.009) had significant effects on the variance (Q). Bonferroni's multiple comparisons were performed for both sets of analyses: to compare BOPSS and the other quantification methods: *Multiplicity-adjusted p < 0.05 (P & Q) ; to compare the results of dual PLA and negative PLA results: # Multiplicity-adjusted p < 0.05 (Q). Data were plotted as mean ± SEM. PLA: Proximity ligation assay.

Journal: Biotechniques

Article Title: Detecting G protein-coupled receptor complexes in postmortem human brain with proximity ligation assay and a Bayesian classifier

doi: 10.2144/btn-2019-0083

Figure Lengend Snippet: Three counting images of the single (A) , dual (B) and negative PLA (C) from subject PI12277 were used to test puncta detection and quantification approaches with selected parameters: Particle Analysis (Image J) with auto threshold (Image J_Auto, D-F), Spot Detector (ICY) with parameters favoring detection of either dual and negative (ICY_D, G–I) or single (ICY_S, J–L) PLA signals, and BOPSS (BOPSS, M–O). Image J and ICY quantified the puncta in the transformed and contrast enhanced images (D–L) as described in Supplementary data. The counted puncta were marked in red dots (D-F & M-O) or labeled in red numbers (G-L) in the analyzed images. Single PLA puncta density results were analyzed with repeated one-way ANOVA; there was a significant effect of quantification method (p = 0.014) (P). Dual PLA and its negative control were analyzed by repeated two-way ANOVA, as they shared the same PLA conditions except for the omission of one of the two primary antibodies; the interaction between quantification method and PLA signal was not significant (accounts for 3.73% for the total variance, p = 0.21); both the quantification method (accounts for 56.9% of the total variance, p = 0.005) and the PLA condition (accounts for 26.22% of the total variance, p = 0.009) had significant effects on the variance (Q). Bonferroni's multiple comparisons were performed for both sets of analyses: to compare BOPSS and the other quantification methods: *Multiplicity-adjusted p < 0.05 (P & Q) ; to compare the results of dual PLA and negative PLA results: # Multiplicity-adjusted p < 0.05 (Q). Data were plotted as mean ± SEM. PLA: Proximity ligation assay.

Article Snippet: We designed a custom MATLAB package Bayesian optimized PLA signal sorting (BOPSS) to analyze PLA signal images [ ].

Techniques: Particle Size Analysis, Transformation Assay, Labeling, Negative Control, Proximity Ligation Assay

Hi-C  chromosome  conformation capture linkage statistics

Journal: BMC Genomics

Article Title: A telomere-to-telomere Eucalyptus regnans genome: unveiling haplotype variance in structure and genes within one of the world’s tallest trees

doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10810-4

Figure Lengend Snippet: Hi-C chromosome conformation capture linkage statistics

Article Snippet: A proximity ligation library for chromosome conformation capture was created with a Phase Genomics Proximo Hi-C (Plant) Kit (version 4), according to the manufacturer’s instructions (document KT3040B).

Techniques: